HARP 2.0 Pricing, Processing and Underwriting in Focus

For those
playing along at home, the U.S. Treasury Department continues to wind down 2008’s
TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief Program.  More than 80% ($333 billion) of the $414 billion funds disbursed for
TARP have already been recovered
to date through repayments and other
income – the latest coming from AIG. The government was paid an additional $1.5
billion from AIG, which pays off in full the Treasury’s preferred equity
investment in AIG more than one year ahead of schedule. That is certainly good

And there is more good news on the hiring front. A California-based mortgage banking operation is looking for personnel
to staff its new Consumer Direct Division
in Orange County. They are a
multi-state Fannie Mae direct lender which funded over $4.4 billion in 2011, of
which over $2.5 billion were serviced retained. Originators can expect
“exclusive leads to be provided with high closing ratio, comprehensive
training program, W-2 platform with benefits, and salary & commissions
during development period.” The ideal candidates should have strong verbal
and written communication skills, and must be California DRE and NMLS licensed.
Interested parties should submit their resumes, to be kept confidential, to
Mike Smith at mikesmith.1000@yahoo.com.

are focused on HARP 2.0, in spite of
some potentially bad pull-through numbers that are circulating. But where will investors price pools with this
Why would anyone pay the same price for a 150% LTV 4.25% loan as
they would for a 60% LTV 4.25% loan? Remember that both Fannie and Freddie have
been buying mortgages with LTV’s greater than 125% through their cash windows
since February, but MBS pools backed by these will be issued starting in June.
A starting point that some investors are using in pricing this new product is
looking at HARP 1.0 pool pricing, backed by mortgages with 105%<LTV<125%.
The 4.0% coupon Fannie pools containing HARP 1.0 loans are priced about 1.5
points worse than “regular” pools, but 4.5% pools (containing 4.75-5.125%
mortgages) are trading with a 3.0 point “payup.” This price difference can equate to .75% or more in rate difference.

At this
point, investors (e.g., pension funds, insurance companies, and so on) in
mortgage-backed securities note that the prepayment speeds between the two
types of loans (standard products and HARP 2.0 loans) could be different, the
ability for investment banks to put HARP 2.0 loans into CMO deals or REMIC’s is
in doubt, and mortgage REITs may have a very limited (if any) bid for these
pools. So until the market for these
loans “settles down” and becomes more liquid, given the reps & warrants for
this product, and it becomes more liquid, originators will continue to see rate
and pricing difference well into the future – and they’d better set borrowers’

LO’s who
know their products are reminding their borrowers that HARP 2.0 is only
available to borrowers whose loan is owned by either Fannie or Freddie.
Normally the underwriting differences
between these two are not that significant, with the biggest difference is that
Freddie will do a pure blended ratio with a non-occupant co-borrower and Fannie
will not. But LO’s jungle drums are saying that the differences in HARP 2 loan
underwriting are dramatic, and that Fannie is much more liberal than Freddie. I
am not an underwriter, but anecdotally, the DTI for Freddie is 45%, for FNMA it
is 65%, Freddie is concerned about cash reserves, and aside from the current
mortgage not having any lates within the last 6 months and only one 30 day late
within the last 12 months, according to Freddie Mac any revolving or
installment late within the last 12 months could kill the deal. Lastly, it is
rumored that revolving debt that is over 50% of the credit limit, in spite of
good credit scores, will cause Freddie Mac to deny/decline the application. And
considering most equity lines are coded as revolving accounts and are typically
over 50% of their credit limit, most Freddie Mac loans will not be refinanced.

Chris M. writes, “I spent 8 years in a large correspondent’s lending
division and have evidence that when a borrower is underwater, it is not if but
when the loan ends up in default or a short pay.   HARP 2.0 will only
delay the inevitable which may be what is needed to stabilize values enough and
give us time to absorb the crud.”

On the
flip side for the positive, EverBank
has spread the word to its clients that it is doing unlimited LTV’s on HARP 2.0.
One AE put forth these simple steps in
doing a HARP loan
. “1. Check if Fannie or Freddie loan.
This website is a very good and direct from the government on what all programs
are available, HARP being one of them. 2. Once you find out Fannie or Freddie,
run it through the appropriate AUS system and make sure to select the HARP
program through the system you run. For those who still don’t know, Fannie Mae
is DO/DU and Freddie is LP. 3. Receive approved findings WITH an appraisal
waiver for ‘unlimited LTV.’ Fannie Mae will be Property Field Waiver, Freddie Mac
will be HVE with High or Moderate confidence level. 4. Review if loan has MI or
is requested MI be put on the loan. If loan has MI it should show the company
and cert # within the findings. Once you have that, please reach out to that MI
company to make sure it is willing to transfer that MI cert over to EverBank
before sending in the loan. Some MI companies might have restrictions. We will
transfer the cert in our underwriting process if MI company allows. 5. Once you
have done all of this, you are ready to submit your loan according to what AUS
findings are asking for conditions to EverBank. Remember, the only time you
will NOT have unlimited LTV is if you have a LPMI or NO appraisal waiver. Also
remember, if a condo to disclose our condo review fee of $200 for existing
projects and $500 for new completed projects. Always disclose the full
appraisal fee upfront just in case, the PIW fee will be $75. Please make sure
to prepare your borrowers for extended turn times, therefor it is suggested to
price and lock for 45 to 60 days during this refi boom of HARP products.” If
you have any questions, write to Jason at Jason.wroble@everbank.com.

builders aren’t too focused on HARP 2.0 loans, but KB Home said Friday that cancellations on contracts for new homes
spiked in its fiscal first quarter, driving home orders down 8% as it heads
into the spring home-selling season. KB, which recently announced that Fortress’
Nationstar unit would be its preferred lender, reported a sharply smaller loss
for the December-to-February quarter. KB’s results fell short of Wall Street
predictions, and shares tumbled more than 9% at one point in Friday trading. The
Commerce Department reported on Friday that sales of new homes in the U.S. fell
in February for the second straight month. They dipped 1.6 percent to a
seasonally adjusted annual rate of 313,000 homes — less than half the 700,000
that economists consider to be healthy. And analysts remind us of the question,
“Why buy a new one when there are so
many old ones around?”
But KB ended the quarter with a 30 percent higher
backlog of homes under contract. Backlog is a strong indicator of potential
future sales — if orders aren’t canceled.


and investors alike are seeing a drop in traditional 30-yr mortgages and both a
huge increase in 15-yr paper and also a slight increase in ARM production. And
stats bear this out: the share of 30-year MBS in total Fannie & Freddie fixed-rate
MBS issuance has declined gradually from 80%-87% in early 2009 to only 59%-64%
in the second half of 2011. In fact, the
recent percentage of 30-year MBS issuance in total F&F fixed-rate MBS is
similar to the levels last seen in 2003
. Yes, the production of shorter
maturity products (10, 15, or 20-yr) picks up in a refi environment, but it has
been somewhat of a surprise their percentage issuance has approached the levels
last seen in 2003 (even after considering the fact that GNMA issuance picked up
a lot and most of the GNMA issuance is in 30-year MBS).

So what is going on out there versus
First, borrowers
refinancing mortgages these days have been in their current mortgage for 4-5
years versus only 1-2 years in 2003. The more seasoned borrowers have a higher
propensity for refinancing into a shorter maturity mortgage, all else equal.
Fannie & Freddie are providing added incentives to refinance into a shorter
maturity mortgage by eliminating LLPAs when a borrower refinances into a
shorter maturity mortgage. And lastly, the difference between shorter maturity
and longer maturity mortgage rates is higher now than in 2003 although the
Treasury and swap curves are somewhat flatter.

financial and political arenas are still reeling from the news that Rod Blagojevich
will not be allowed to use hair dye in his Colorado prison. Nonetheless, we
will move forward or at least in some direction. The 10-yr T-note closed Friday
at 2.24%, but mortgages did not do well prompting one trader to note, “The MBS
market is about as constructive as my mother-in-law at the dinner table.”

We’ll see
how the laws of supply (originator selling & hedging) and demand (by the
Fed and others) stack up this week, but we have a pretty busy week for U.S.
economic news. Today is Pending Home Sales, tomorrow is the Case-Shiller
housing price index and Consumer Confidence, and Wednesday is the
always-volatile Durable Goods number. Thursday is Jobless Claims and a GDP
number for the 4th quarter (old news by now). And on Friday are
Personal Income & Spending, PCE prices, and numbers from the Chicago
purchasing managers and the University of Michigan. In the early going the 10-yr is up to 2.27% and MBS prices are worse
between .125-.250.

A doctor
says to his patient, “I have bad news and worse news.”
“Oh dear, what’s the bad news?” asks the patient.
The doctor replies, “You only have 24 hours to live.”
“That’s terrible,” said the patient.  “How can the news
possibly be worse?”
The doctor replies, “I’ve been trying to contact you since


…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

Fatal error: Uncaught Exception: 12: REST API is deprecated for versions v2.1 and higher (12) thrown in /home4/jdvc/public_html/wp-content/plugins/seo-facebook-comments/facebook/base_facebook.php on line 1273