Despite January Numbers, Annual Foreclosure Rate Down

RealtyTrac reported this morning that
foreclosure activity rose 3 percent in January as several states posted spikes
in one or more steps in the process.  Foreclosure
filings were reported on a total of 210,941 U.S. properties or one in every 624
housing units during the month, however, even with the month-over-month increase
in filings overall activity was 19 percent below that in January 2010. 

RealtyTrac, an Irvine California
company, compiles a U.S. Foreclosure Market ReportTM each month by tracking
documents filed in the three stages of foreclosure:

1.  Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS). This is the first legal notification
from a lender that the borrower on a mortgage loan has defaulted under the
terms of their mortgage and the lender intends to foreclose unless the loan is
brought current.

2.  Auction – Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure Sale
(NTS and NFS)
: if the
borrower does not catch up on their payments the lender will file a notice of
sale (the lender intends to sell the property). This notice is published in
local paper and contains information pertaining to the date, time and subject
property address.

3.  Real Estate Owned or REO properties : “REO” stands for “real estate owned”
and typically refers to the inventory of real estate that banks and mortgage
companies have foreclosed on and subsequently purchased through the foreclosure
auction if there was no offer higher than the minimum bid.

Filings in two of the three categories
above rose during the month and the third, default notices were unchanged from
the previous month with 58,362 filings. 
This was 22 percent less than one year earlier.  Foreclosure auctions were scheduled on 86,037
properties in January, an increase of 1 percent from December but down 20
percent from a year earlier. The numbers of properties taken into bank
inventory by lenders (REO) jumped 8 percent to 66,542 properties but this was
still 15 percent fewer than in January 2011.

Brandon Moore, CEO of RealtyTrac
said of the numbers, “Although overall foreclosure activity was down from a
year ago for the 16th straight month in January, we continue to see
signs on a local and regional level that the frozen-up foreclosure process is
beginning to thaw.”  He noted the
increase of activity on an annual basis in several states which he said
followed a pattern that started in late 2011. 

“We expect the pattern of increasing
foreclosures to continue in the coming months,” Moore said, “especially given
the finalized mortgage and foreclosure settlement
reached in early February between 49 state attorneys general and five of the
nation’s largest lenders. The settlement sets forth clear guidelines for
lenders and servicers to follow when foreclosing, which should allow them to
push through some of the delayed foreclosures from last year. Other roadblocks
to foreclosure are still in place at the state level, however, including
legislation altering the foreclosure process and lawsuits against lenders. We
expect to see somewhat uneven trends in local and regional foreclosure numbers
going forward as lenders work through these additional legislative and legal
roadblocks.” 

Several states saw an increase or
more than 20 percent in default notices compared to one year earlier, with huge
increases in Maryland (100 percent) and Pennsylvania (112 percent). Other
states with big increases were Florida (36 percent), Massachusetts (27
percent), and Connecticut (23 percent). 

States with big increases in
scheduled auctions included Illinois and Indiana which were both up 141 percent
on an annual basis, South Carolina (79 percent), Massachusetts (57 percent) and
Minnesota (24 percent).  REO activity
jumped in Massachusetts, up 75 percent, New Hampshire (62 percent), Indiana (60
percent), and Illinois (52 percent). 

It is difficult to draw conclusions
about the state level figures however, because in some cases the base was relatively
small.   Massachusetts, for example, saw
big increases in all three categories of filings but even after the increases
foreclosure activity overall was one filing per 1,191 households, about half
the national rate.  The big jumps in default
notices in Pennsylvania and Maryland were against even smaller existing
numbers.  In the case of Illinois,
Florida, and a few others of the states above the increases came in states
where rates were already devastating, in Illinois, for example, the rate is one
filing per 369 households and in Florida one in 363.

The three states that have topped
the list of filings for years continue to have problems but are finally improving.
  Nevada’s filings fell by 52 percent from
figures a year earlier and are now at a 52 month low with one in 198 properties
affected.  California’s activity was also
at a multi-year low, down 23 percent from a year earlier.  Still, one in every 265 housing units was
subject to a filing during the month.  In
Arizona the annual rate was down 44 percent however the state saw an uptick of
14 percent from December.  The rate is
Arizona is one in 325 properties.

Even better news; the decreases in
all three states were driven by drops in the numbers of default notices – the first
step in the foreclosure process.  In
Nevada these filings have averaged fewer than 1,200 per month since October
compared to more than 4,000 per month in the first nine months of the year and
in California default notices were at the rate of 18,000 in December and
January compared to an average over 28,000 in the three previous months.  Arizona also saw a big drop in foreclosure
starts which averaged 4,300 during the last two months after averaging more
than 7,500 in the previous 12 months.

Other states still suffering high
foreclosure rates are Georgia (one in 328) and Michigan (one in 354).

…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.


Fatal error: Uncaught Exception: 12: REST API is deprecated for versions v2.1 and higher (12) thrown in /home4/jdvc/public_html/wp-content/plugins/seo-facebook-comments/facebook/base_facebook.php on line 1273