Mortgage Rates Improve But Remain On Fence Between Recent Offerings

Yesterday marked the first time since late January that Best-Execution Mortgages Rates
stood at 4.0% on average, as opposed to what had been the prevailing average of 3.875%. Rates improved today for most lenders, several of whom once again are offering 3.875% as a “best-execution rate” (learn more about what that means in this previous post with more detailed discussion about Best-Execution calculations).  But a significant portion of the market remains in 4.0% territory.  Best-Execution is very much on a fence between the two rates after today’s improvements.

Apart from the slightly more favorable rate environment, little has changed between yesterday and today.  Since Best-Execution is by no means firmly back to 3.875%, the question remains whether or not this will prove to be a brief foray into
4.0%.  The tone of news surrounding the Greek bailout seems to have shifted in favor of “forays remaining brief” as the skeptics have emerged, calling attention to the unsustainability
of the agreed-to austerity measures, among other things. 

Treasury Auctions–another market event on our radar–haven’t done any additional damage to mortgage rates’ chances of returning to previous levels, but they haven’t significantly helped either.  Still, the absence of a negative is a positive in this context.  For now, bond markets, including MBS (the “mortgage backed securities” that most directly influence mortgage rates) seem to suggest that their default stance is one of strength, and detractors will have to prove their case in order for that to change. 

Tomorrow brings the last of the week’s Treasury auctions.  Simply getting through these auctions without too much damage to MBS is a net positive.  The reason for this is that Treasury Auctions create a need for bond markets to absorb new SUPPLY.  Naturally, higher supply suggests lower prices, all things being equal, and lower prices in bond markets mean higher yields or INTEREST RATES.  Although MBS and mortgage rates aren’t directly affected by these supply considerations for Treasuries, they’re roughly analogous financial instruments that serve a need among fixed-income investors.  If those investors are buying more of one, they’ll generally be able to buy less of the other. 

Despite this oversimplification, this is how new Treasury supply can detract from MBS prices, thus putting some upward pressure on rates.  It goes both ways though…  If the auctions are met with better-than-expected demand, it leads to small shifts in investor sentiment that can ultimately leave bond markets in better territory than they were before the auctions.  To reiterate, today and yesterday’s auction certainly haven’t done any additional damage in this regard, but haven’t helped either.  Even if tomorrow’s auction is similarly uneventful, there can sometimes be a “relief bid” (bid = demand = rates lower) simply due to the conclusion of this week’s auction cycle being over.

Today’s BEST-EXECUTION Rates

  • 30YR FIXED -  4.0% more prevalent.  Some 3.875%’s remain
  • FHA/VA -3.75%
  • 15 YEAR FIXED -  3.25%
  • 5 YEAR ARMS -  2.625-3.25% depending on the lender

Ongoing Lock/Float Considerations

  • Rates and costs continue to operate near all time best levels
  • Current levels have experienced increasing resistance in improving much from here
  • There are technical reasons for that as well as fundamental reasons 
  • Lenders tend to get busier when rates are in this “high 3′s” level
    and can throttle their inbound volume by raising rates or costs.
  • While we don’t necessarily think rates are destined to go higher,
    given the above facts, there seems to be more risk than reward regarding
    floating
  • But that will always be the case when rates operating near historic lows
  • (As always, please keep in mind that our talk of
    Best-Execution always pertains to a completely ideal scenario.  There
    can be all sorts of reasons that your quoted rate would not be the same
    as our average rates, and in those cases, assuming you’re following
    along on a day to day basis, simply use the Best-Ex levels we quote as a
    baseline to track potential movement in your quoted rate).

…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

Freddie Mac: Economy on Slow, Steady, Path to Recovery

In the February Economic Outlook from
Freddie Mac’s Office of the Chief Economist is projecting a slow, steady path
to recovery as the economy, it says, continues to build on the momentum it
displayed at the end of last year.  The
report cites 243,000 new jobs in January, an unemployment rate falling to 8.3
percent and an increase in job openings to 3.4 million in December as
indications of improvement.  At the same
time, there was a relatively low level of 2 million “voluntary separations,”
i.e. people quitting their jobs, that reflects a nervousness about the job market
and a 1.2 percent drop in inflation-adjusted hourly wages, the steepest annual
fall since 1989, also signaling job market weakness.

The housing sector portion of the Freddie
Mac report was a summary of information for the month already reported here
from sources such as the National Association of Realtors®,
S&P/Case-Shiller, Mortgage Bankers Association, and others.  Most of the housing data shows improving
sales, declining inventories, and continued softening of home prices.  Freddie Mac said it expects “more warmth” in
the housing market sometime in 2013 “as the economy continues on its slow path
to a stronger recovery in a low interest-rate environment.”

The office is projecting that, by the
end of 2013 housing starts will be at an annual level of 1 million (compared to
1.36 million in 2007, the last year before the market collapsed) and sales of
5.05 million (compared to 5.19 million.)   
Prices are expected to gain some footing this year and begin to increase
in the first quarter of 2013.

…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

A Call to Action – FHFA’s Strategic Plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Yesterday the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) issued to Congress its Strategic Plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Conservatorships.

Acting Director DeMarco and FHFA staff are to be soundly commended for their work in developing and publishing the Plan. The Plan is equally thoughtful and provocative and represents an essential next step in the continuing efforts to resolve the nation’s housing crisis.

For example, the Plan acknowledges the critical importance of the technical and business infrastructures currently maintained and managed by the GSEs and without which the effective function of secondary market securitizations would be impossible. Likewise, the Plan notes the critical role of both GSEs in the nation’s continuing efforts to resolve the foreclosure crisis and maintain the availability of credit for American homeowners. Lastly, the Plan posits that the current market dominance of the GSEs is unsustainable and must be reduced through the return of private capital to an industry now dominated by the federal government.

But what distinguishes the Plan in particular is the fact that while it lays out markers and establishes broad goals, it does not set out the specific tactical requirements to achieve those goals – a fact that its detractors will no doubt likely seize upon. But nor shouldit – that is not the role of a strategic plan the purpose of which is to identify key macro considerations, objectives and risks.

FHFA should also be commended for its intellectual honesty – too often absent in Washington – for acknowledging the critically important role of Congress and the Administration in defining the “future structure of housing finance” in America and their collective inability thus far to do so.

And it may be that last point that is the Plan’s most important – as it serves as a challenge to Congress and the Administration to put politics aside and get to the business of governing. Indeed, the future of housing finance in America – and the economic well being of us all – may well depend on their willingness and ability to do so.

…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

NAR: Existing Home Sales and Inventories Improved in January

There was more good news from the
National Association of Realtors® (NAR) on Wednesday as they reported that the
sales of existing homes rose in January, marking three months out of the last
four where sales improved.  Inventories of
homes for sale were also improved and NAR disputed the need for a program to
rent foreclosed properties

Total sales of existing homes
including single family houses, condominiums, and cooperative apartments, increased
4.3 percent
to an annual, seasonally adjusted rate of 4.57 million units during
the month compared to a downward revised rate of 4.38 million in December and
are 0.7 percent above what NAR described as a “spike” in the rate in January
2011.  December 2011 sales were
originally estimated at a rate of 4.61 million.

The median price of all property
types was $154,700 in January, an annual decrease of 2.0 percent.  Foreclosed properties accounted for 22
percent of all sales and short sales for 13 percent.  The total distressed sales were down 3
percentage points from the 35 percent reported in December and 5 percentage
points lower than those sales one year earlier.  

Sales of existing single-family
homes rose 3.8 percent to 4.05 million from 3.90 million in December and are
2.3 percent higher than the 3.96 million pace in January 2010.  The median price of a single-family home was
$154,400 in January, down 2.6 percent from a year earlier.

Click Here to View the Existing Homes Sales Chart

Condominium and co-op sales jumped
8.3 percent to 520,000 from 480,000 in December but remained10.3 percent below
the 580,000-unit level in January 2011.The median existing condo price was
$156,600, up 2.0 percent from the year before.

Total
housing inventory at the end of January fell 0.4 percent to 2.31 million
existing homes available for sale, which represents a 6.1-month supply at the
current sales pace, down from a 6.4-month supply in December.  Total
unsold listed inventory has trended down from a record 4.04 million in July
2007, and is 20.6 percent below a year ago. 

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist,
said strong gains in contract activity in recent months show buyers are
responding to very favorable market conditions.  “The uptrend in home
sales is in line with all of the underlying fundamentals – pent-up household
formation, record-low mortgage interest rates, bargain home prices, sustained
job creation and rising rents.”

 ”The
broad inventory condition can be described as moving into a rough balance, not favoring
buyers or sellers,” he said.  “Foreclosure sales are moving swiftly with
ready home buyers and investors competing in nearly all markets.  A
government proposal to turn bank-owned properties into rentals on a large scale
does not appear to be needed at this time.”

All-cash sales were unchanged at 31
percent in January; they were 32 percent in January 2011.  Investors, who
account for the bulk of cash transactions, purchased 23 percent of all homes in
January compared to 21 percent in December but unchanged from a year earlier.  First-time buyers accounted for 33 percent of
sales in January compared to 31 percent in December and 29 percent in January
2011.

Forty-seven percent of NAR members
report that contracts settled on time in January; 21 percent had delays and 33
percent experienced contract failures.  Contract cancellations are
unchanged from December but were only 9 percent in January 2011; they are
caused largely by declined mortgage applications and failures in loan
underwriting from appraisals coming in below the negotiated price.

Sales were up in every region but
prices were down.  In the Northeast
existing home sales were up 3.4 percent month-over-month and 7.1 percent
year-over-year to an annual rate of 600,000 but the median price of $225,700
was 4.2 percent lower than a year earlier.

Sales in the
Midwest were at a pace of 980,000, 1.0 percent higher than December and 3.2 percent
higher than one year earlier but the median price declined 3.9 percent to
$122,000.

In the South, sales
rose 3.5 percent from December to 1.76 million in January but are unchanged from a year ago while the median price
declined a slight 0.3 percent to $134,800 on an annual basis.

Existing-home
sales took a healthy 8.8 percent month-over-month jump in the West to a 1.23
million annual pace but are 3.1 percent below a spike in January 2011. 
The median price in the West was $187,100, down 1.8 percent from a year ago.

…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

MERS Has Second Court Win in Month

For the second time in just under a
month the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) has won a significant
court victory.  The company which serves
as registration agent for major mortgage lenders is currently involved in
multiple lawsuits throughout the country.   It prevailed in one of these suits, a case filed
the U.S. Court for the Western District of Kentucky on Tuesday when Christian County Clerk, by and through its
County Clerk, Michael Kem; et al. v MERS; et al.
was dismissed with
prejudice.

The county clerks had sued MERS and a
group of MERS members under provisions of the Kentucky laws regarding the
recording of deeds. The Plaintiffs asserted, on behalf of all of the state’s
County Clerks that MERS had violated the statutes in order to avoid recording
mortgages and paying the associated fees. 

The Court found that the Clerks lacked
standing to bring the suit.  The judge
held that the persons intended to be protected by Kentucky’s land record system
were “existing lienholders seeking to give notice of their secured status,
prospective purchasers and creditors seeking information about prior liens, and
owners of property seeking release of liens once debts are paid off.”

The Court also said that there was
nothing in the statute that would indicate it was designed to be enforced by a
county clerk, saying that had “the General Assembly wanted to allow country
clerks to file lawsuits regarding recording fees, it certainly knew how to do
so.”

On
January 24 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Judicial Circuit
handed down a more far-reaching decision upholding MERS rights to foreclose on
a property
as a nominee and to foreclose on a mortgage that had been physically
separated from the note. 

…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.